Muse: Re-reinterpreting Folies Bergere

MUSE: REINTERPRETING “FOLIES BERGERE”

Click to enlarge image

A few months ago, my collaborator Niki and I were trekking around the city in search of an ornate yet inexpensive antique chair for an upcoming shoot as part of the Muse series. We ventured to the south side of Chicago to a warehouse of old hotel furniture, and then wound our way back up to a few shops on Grand Avenue. While meandering through an architectural salvage and event space, we both at the same moment stood frozen, flashed wide-eyed and knowing glances at each other, and then began to twitter with excitement. We saw the bar and knew it would be the perfect location for our upcoming reinterpretation of the Eduard Manet painting “A Bar at the Folies Bergere” from 1882.

Four months later, Niki and I (in full drag makeup and boy clothes), amidst a typically snowy and frigid Chicago February, began unpacking our gear, setting up the light kit and arranging all of our props. Having rented the space on a day it wasn’t usually open, we mostly had the place to ourselves, except for a couple of staff and the crew of guys redoing the wood floors on the second level.

Often, the shoot process is quite technical and the most time-consuming part is just getting all of the lighting in its ideal location and level. But despite that, Niki and I seem to have our own setup rhythm. Before we know it, with costume on and hat duct taped to my head, we are taking our initial test shots. Well into the shooting process, somewhere between the back and forths of head turns and up and downs of chin and focal points, there are two things that happen – and which have happened in pretty much every shoot we’ve done together. First, we both feel something – a kind of internal “YES!” For me, it’s what we artists call flow. My focus becomes narrow and the volume of my surrounding periphery reduces. A softness settles into my body and there’s a sense of effortless connection and collaboration with Niki. In the process, it feels as if we become one. And it’s usually right after this moment that the second thing happens – we get the giggles. Every. Single. Time. For some unknown reason we just start giggling, and on occasion, have to succumb to a fit of laughter before getting back to the business at hand. Fortunately, we both embrace it as a simple part of the process, and know it’s a likely sign that we’ve got the shot we’re looking for.

© Niki Grangruth & James Kinser

And speaking of process, when I started working on this costume eight years ago, Niki and I had only just begun working together. At that time, I didn’t see any connection between the costume and the Muse project, let alone the Folies Bergere shoot. It was just a costume that I intuitively knew I needed to make. Now, I can’t imagine having done the shoot with anything else.

Another synchronicity at which we marvel, is that the Folies Bergere painting was the first piece that Niki and I attempted to reinterpret. I say “attempted” because, looking back at that original shoot now, it is laughable at how much we had yet to figure out. We simply weren’t as attuned as we are now to the environment or the costume, and my relationship with the camera/viewer was way more timid and less engaged than our work that would follow.

But all these years later, it has been extremely rewarding to have returned to this painting and to have reinterpreted it with a more mature and refined eye. We hope you’ll enjoy the soon-to-come result and this slight peek into the process along the way.

Recent Posts

Censorship & Discovery

Recently, we submitted two pieces of work for an exhibition that explored the topic of identity. We were excited to read in the prospectus that it requested work that would “examine our notions of self” and investigate “constituent parts of identity,” and asked the question “How much of an individual’s identity is personal and self-constructed, and how much of it depends on something socially created?” These ideas were so appealing because they are the exact notions and questions that compose a significant portion of the conceptual foundation of our work.

Portrait of Madame X [After Singer Sargent], 2013

Portrait of Madame X [After Singer Sargent], 2013

Mrs. George Swinton (after Sargent), 2017

Mrs. George Swinton (after Sargent), 2017

Both photographs above were selected by the curator and were subsequently excluded by university staff. In our correspondence with them, the staff articulated their understanding of how the work addressed the theme, and how it raised questions that deserved attention. However, they stated that their venue wasn’t the right location to further the types of discussions that typically accompany our work. Once we understood that the university was owned and operated by the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, we could better understand their concerns and perspective, and we chose to graciously honor their choice.

For valid reasons or not, frankly, it sucks to have work censored. But were we to focus on that, we wouldn’t have been open to the gift that followed. The entire experience drove up within both Niki and I a raft of feelings, thoughts, and emotions that ultimately surfaced a greater commitment to our work and increased connection between us as artists. Below are three key discoveries.

Mission

Like most any artist would be, we were shocked and angry when we initially received the news about our work being censored. But we both recognized that to stay in that space of anger neither served us nor the mission of our work. In fact, we took a step back and recognized that one of the primary reasons we make work as part of the Muse series is to foster respective discourse and exchange of ideas and perspectives. Specifically, we hope our work challenges untruths and misguided prejudices against individuals who do not conform to strict masculine or feminine identities.

Shared Experience

During the formulation of our letter to the university staff addressing the matter, both Niki and I were reminded of the values and morals fostered by our undergraduate experiences at small Lutheran liberal arts colleges. As Niki is an alum of St. Olaf in Minnesota and I am an alum of Bethany College in Kansas, we recognized that our religious educations led us to understand that we are to be open-minded; that we as humans are not to judge others; that we are to treat all individuals with respect, dignity, and compassion; that we are to love others regardless of the intricacies that make up their identity; and that we have a responsibility to continue our individual growth by seeking out and engaging in diverse experiences with a variety of people from different backgrounds.

Quality & Context

While aesthetics and technical adeptness are an inherent part of the work in the Muse series, our desire isn’t to make art that is purely decorative or “pretty.” Good works of art challenge us; they question social constructs, and they ask viewers to look at things from different points of view. As artists, every choice of costume, set, and source painting upon which the photograph is based is imbued with meaning and characterized by deliberate intention. We acknowledge that this context is not always discernible by all viewers, which may cause the work to seem confrontational or offensive. This has never been our intended outcome. Through blog posts, in-person conversations, artist talks, etc., we make concerted efforts to help people see the intention and considerations that go into each piece.

Annunciation (after Botticelli), 2015

Annunciation (after Botticelli), 2015

In hindsight, perhaps for this exhibition we should have submitted the Annunciation (After Botticelli), a piece that more overtly bridges the topics of religion, identity, and gender. But then again, our journey just might not have been as fortuitous.

  1. Tilda! Leave a reply
  2. Why All the Costumes, Makeup, Rhinestones, and Glitter? Leave a reply
  3. Muse: Niki Grangruth & James Kinser Leave a reply
  4. Columbia College Alumni Give Art History a Gender-Identity Makeover Leave a reply